Median response time
From detection to autonomous containment. Measured, not estimated.
Continuous AI validation, board-ready risk visibility, and measurable resilience. Built on the Evada platform and delivered by The Cyber Assurance.
Traditional engagements give you a risk snapshot from a particular Tuesday in Q2. Evada gives you a live attack-surface map that updates as your infrastructure changes. New endpoints. New services. New cloud resources. All discovered. All tested. Automatically.
Standard vulnerability scanners list potential issues. Evada correlates signals. Actively tests exploit paths in a safe sandbox. Then prioritises findings based on real-world risk and business impact. 98.7% protection accuracy is not a marketing figure. It is the published, measured platform performance.
For agreed playbooks the system contains confirmed exploits autonomously. Block the source IP. Isolate the host. Revoke the token. No waiting on a human. Median response time: 600 milliseconds. Measured. Not estimated.
The same red-team techniques. A radically different operating model.
The two are complementary. We recommend continuous AI testing alongside annual human-led red team engagements for novel attack-vector coverage.
Evada is the AI-powered pentesting and exposure validation platform combining continuous testing with autonomous defence. Used by security leaders across healthcare, government and financial services to defend critical operations.
From detection to autonomous containment. Measured, not estimated.
Validated detections. Sandbox confirmation eliminates the false-positive flood.
Continuous discovery. New endpoints, services, and resources are detected automatically.
Of confirmed exploits contained without waiting on a human.
Connect Evada to your cloud accounts, on-prem networks, and identity providers.
Establish your normal baseline. APIs, traffic patterns, identity behaviour.
Autonomous testing, validated alerts, automated containment per agreed playbooks.
A senior consultant analyses findings, refines scope, and validates novel attack vectors.
Continuous vs episodic. Autonomous vs manual. AI-validated vs human-confirmed. The two are complementary, not substitutes. Most clients run AI pentesting continuously and a human-led red team annually for novel attack vector coverage.
No, and we wouldn't claim it does. Humans are still better at novel attack vectors, business-logic flaws, and creative chain-of-exploits. We recommend annual human-led testing alongside continuous AI testing.
98.7% protection accuracy is the published figure. Sandbox validation before flagging dramatically reduces the noise that plagues traditional scanners. We tune further during the discovery month.
No. The platform tests attack surface. Endpoints, configurations, IAM, and identity behaviour. Not data content. Specific data-protection clauses are in the engagement contract.
You do. Full read access. We do. For quarterly review and ongoing tuning. Evada (the platform vendor) holds the data per their DPA, which we'll share before any contract.