The autonomous red team.
For security leaders who can't afford blind spots.

Continuous AI validation, board-ready risk visibility, and measurable resilience. Built on the Evada platform and delivered by The Cyber Assurance.

From snapshot to live view.

Traditional engagements give you a risk snapshot from a particular Tuesday in Q2. Evada gives you a live attack-surface map that updates as your infrastructure changes. New endpoints. New services. New cloud resources. All discovered. All tested. Automatically.

Validated. Not noisy.

Standard vulnerability scanners list potential issues. Evada correlates signals. Actively tests exploit paths in a safe sandbox. Then prioritises findings based on real-world risk and business impact. 98.7% protection accuracy is not a marketing figure. It is the published, measured platform performance.

Autonomous containment.

For agreed playbooks the system contains confirmed exploits autonomously. Block the source IP. Isolate the host. Revoke the token. No waiting on a human. Median response time: 600 milliseconds. Measured. Not estimated.

Traditional pen testing.
vs the autonomous red team.

The same red-team techniques. A radically different operating model.

Traditional pen test
Evada AI pen test
Cadence
Once or twice per year
Continuous. 24/7.
Findings
Stale by the time you read them
Live as infrastructure changes
False positives
Vulnerability scanner chatter
Sandbox-validated. 98.7% accuracy.
Containment
Human-led. Days to weeks.
Autonomous. 600 ms median.
Attack-surface coverage
What the tester remembered to scope
Auto-discovered. 92% coverage.
Board reporting
PDF in your inbox. Quarterly.
Live dashboard. Quarterly underwritten review.
SIEM / SOAR integration
Manual ticket workflow
Native API. Findings flow into your pipeline.

The two are complementary. We recommend continuous AI testing alongside annual human-led red team engagements for novel attack-vector coverage.

EVADA AI PLATFORM

Built on the platform trusted by 120+ security programs.

Evada is the AI-powered pentesting and exposure validation platform combining continuous testing with autonomous defence. Used by security leaders across healthcare, government and financial services to defend critical operations.

  • Attack Surface Discovery. Continuously identifies exploitable paths.
  • AI Pentester Pipelines. Automated offensive testing at scale.
  • Exploit Validation Sandbox. Safely confirms exploitability before alerting.
  • Executive Risk Reporting. Compliance-ready evidence on demand.

The numbers that matter.

600 ms

Median response time

From detection to autonomous containment. Measured, not estimated.

98.7 %

Protection accuracy

Validated detections. Sandbox confirmation eliminates the false-positive flood.

92 %

Attack-surface coverage

Continuous discovery. New endpoints, services, and resources are detected automatically.

67 %

Autonomous containment

Of confirmed exploits contained without waiting on a human.

Connect. Train. Monitor. Review.

1

Integration

Connect Evada to your cloud accounts, on-prem networks, and identity providers.

2

AI training

Establish your normal baseline. APIs, traffic patterns, identity behaviour.

3

Continuous monitoring

Autonomous testing, validated alerts, automated containment per agreed playbooks.

4

Quarterly human review

A senior consultant analyses findings, refines scope, and validates novel attack vectors.

  • Evada platform onboarding.Connected to your environment, scoped, baselined, tuned.
  • Live attack-surface dashboard.Always-on view of exposed assets, validated findings, containment status.
  • Autonomous containment playbooks.Agreed responses for confirmed exploits. Block, isolate, revoke.
  • Quarterly human review.Senior consultant analyses findings, validates novel attacks, tunes scope.
  • Board-ready executive reports.Risk posture trend, time-to-detect, time-to-contain, attack-surface change.
  • SIEM & ticketing integration.Findings flow into your existing detection & response pipeline.

Built on serious foundations.

  • Evada AI Platform
  • MITRE ATT&CK
  • NIST CSF (Continuous Monitoring)
  • ISO 27001 A.8.16
  • OWASP Top 10

Frequently asked.

How is this different from traditional pen testing?

Continuous vs episodic. Autonomous vs manual. AI-validated vs human-confirmed. The two are complementary, not substitutes. Most clients run AI pentesting continuously and a human-led red team annually for novel attack vector coverage.

Does it replace human penetration testing entirely?

No, and we wouldn't claim it does. Humans are still better at novel attack vectors, business-logic flaws, and creative chain-of-exploits. We recommend annual human-led testing alongside continuous AI testing.

What about false positives?

98.7% protection accuracy is the published figure. Sandbox validation before flagging dramatically reduces the noise that plagues traditional scanners. We tune further during the discovery month.

Is the AI accessing our data?

No. The platform tests attack surface. Endpoints, configurations, IAM, and identity behaviour. Not data content. Specific data-protection clauses are in the engagement contract.

Who has access?

You do. Full read access. We do. For quarterly review and ongoing tuning. Evada (the platform vendor) holds the data per their DPA, which we'll share before any contract.

Make compliance
feel inevitable.

Book a free consultation