01
Cloud posture identified
CSPM-style review across every account and region.
Cloud security,
mapped to your provider.
AWS, Azure, GCP. We find the misconfigurations, IAM gaps and exposed data that automated scanners miss.
Posture review.
Every account, every region, every workload. We map your real attack surface, not what the org chart says it should be. Public buckets, snapshot-shares, exposed RDPs and cross-account trust. Surfaced and prioritised.
What we look for.
Public S3/Blob/GCS buckets, over-permissive IAM roles, unencrypted snapshots and volumes, overly-broad security groups, logging gaps (no CloudTrail, no Activity Logs), container misconfigurations (privileged pods, exposed dashboards), exposed secrets in pipelines.
Multi-cloud, single method.
Same methodology across AWS, Azure, and GCP. CIS Benchmarks, the CSA Cloud Controls Matrix, and ISO 27017/27018 as the underlying frameworks. Tool-agnostic.
Why it matters.
02
Regulatory compliance
GDPR, ISO 27017/27018, FedRAMP-aware controls.
03
Secure data lifecycle
At-rest and in-transit encryption verified, key rotation policies set.
04
Shared responsibility
Clearly mapped. No assumption that your provider has it covered.
Inventory. Scan. Audit. Remediate.
1
Account inventory
Every account, every region, every workload mapped. Owners assigned where missing.
2
Posture scan
CIS Benchmarks compliance review across compute, storage, network, identity.
3
IAM deep-dive
Trust relationships, role chaining, exposed access keys, MFA enforcement.
4
Remediation plan
Prioritised by exposure. Terraform / CloudFormation snippets for common fixes included.
- Cloud account inventory.Every account, every region, every workload with ownership map.
- CIS Benchmarks report.Compliance percentage by section, with severity-ranked failures.
- IAM trust-graph visualisation.Who can assume what, across accounts.
- Encryption status.KMS / Key Vault / Cloud KMS coverage, snapshot & transit encryption gaps.
- Logging & detection gap report.What you can't currently see. And what to log to close it.
- Remediation IaC.Terraform / CloudFormation / Bicep snippets to fix common findings.
Standards we benchmark against.
- CIS AWS Benchmark
- CIS Azure Benchmark
- CIS GCP Benchmark
- CIS Kubernetes Benchmark
- CSA Cloud Controls Matrix
- ISO/IEC 27017
- ISO/IEC 27018
- NIST SP 800-53
Frequently asked.
Do you do multi-cloud?
Yes. Same methodology across AWS, Azure, GCP. We can run a unified review with one report or per-cloud reports. Your call.
One-time or ongoing?
Both. A one-time deep review is a useful baseline. For environments that change constantly, an ongoing CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) layer is more cost-effective than repeated point-in-time engagements.
What about containers and Kubernetes?
Included. We assess against the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark plus workload-level checks for privileged pods, exposed dashboards, secret handling, network policies, and runtime security.
Will you fix things, or just find them?
Both. Most clients fix internally using our IaC remediation templates. For high-severity findings, we can pair with your team or do the remediation work as a follow-on engagement.
How is this different from a cloud pen test?
Different lens. Cloud security review focuses on misconfigurations, IAM, and posture. The "configuration as code" problem. Penetration testing focuses on exploitable vulnerabilities. Most mature orgs do both.